Document Information
Date: 1867-01-30
By: John A. Macdonald
Citation: Letter from John A. Macdonald to Lord Carnarvon (30 January 1867).
Other formats: Click here to view the original document (PDF).
20339
Westminster Palace Hotel,
Victoria Street, London,
S.W.
January 30, 1867
My dear Lord Carnarvon
Our propositions were
1st That the tenure of office for the Senate should be for life.
2d That to preserve sectional interests, each of the three sections should be equally represented.
We left the case there, but your
20340
Lordship called our attention to the chance of a deadlock. To meet your Lordship’s views, and as we understand it, the opinion of the Cabinet we offered this suggestion, that whenever a that whenever a money Bill was rejected once, or whenever any other Bill passed by the Commons was
20341
rejected by the Upper Chamber three times, it would be a justification for the Governor, with the advice of his Council, to add to the Upper House a sufficient number to carry the measure, provided that such Bill was carried on its third reading in the Commons by
20342
a majority of two out of the three sections of which the Confederation is composed.
This majority is to be an absolute majority of all the members and not [illegible] [merely] of those voting.
In making the additions, equality is to be preserved. As vacancies occur, they are not to be filled up
20343
until the normal number of 24 for each section is reached. Of course, provision must be made for the contingency of another dead lock before we get down to our original numbers.
With respect to the constitution of the Senate on its first presentation, we propose that the names shall be settled by the Governors of the respective provinces with their councils.
20344
Should any irreconcilable difference of opinions arise, which I cannot well anticipate the parties shall [to] [shall] be appointed by [on] the Imperial Government on the Governors’ recommendation and on their personal responsibility as Imperial officers.
It is suggested that the names should be inserted in the proclamation declaring the Union. I can say now to you, what I could not well say at the meeting yesterday, that any immediate nomination would be [illegible] prejudicial to the existing Governments in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The Legislatures of both those provinces meet in March, and if the list were settled now, every man in the Upper House of both those provinces who is omitted, rightly or wrongly, would vote against the Government.
Believe me to be, dear Lord Carnarvon,
Very sincerely yours,
JOHN A. MACDONALD