Document Information Date: 1981-04-02 By: Canada (Parliament) Citation: Canada, House of Commons Debates, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess, 1981 at 8875. Other formats: Click here to view the original document (PDF). THE CONSTITUTION—RIGHT TO LIFE 0F UNBORN CHILDREN—MOTION UNDER S.O. 43 Mr. S. J. Korchinski (Mackenzie): Madam Speaker, I rise under the provisions of Standing Order 43 on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity. Since the proposed Constitution does not give consideration to the rights of unborn children,and since the abortion rate last year was 65,000, the lives exterminated representing… Read more Canada, House of Commons Debates, “The Constitution—Right to Life of Unborn Children—Motion under S.O. 43”, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess (2 April 1981) →
Document Information Date: 1981-04-02 By: Canada (Parliament) Citation: Canada, Senate Debates, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess, 1981 at 2227-2228. Other formats: Click here to view the original document (PDF). April 2, I981 SENATE DEBATES 2227 THE CONSTITUTION MOTION FOR AN ADDRESS TO HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN- MOTION IN AMENDMENT-DEBATE CONTINUED The Senate resumed from yesterday the debate on the motion of Senator Perrault that an Address be presented to Her Majesty the Queen respecting the Constitution of Canada, and on the motion in amendment thereto of Senator Yuzyk. Hon. Edward M.… Read more Canada, Senate Debates, “Motion for an Address to Her Majesty the Queen—Motion in Amendment—Debate Continues”, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess (2 April 1981) →
Document Information Date: 1981-04-02 By: Canada (Parliament) Citation: Canada, House of Commons Debates, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess, 1981 at 8903-8909. Other formats: Click here to view the original document (PDF). APPLICATION OF FEDERAL LAWS IN VARIOUS PROVINCIAL COURTS Mr. Hal Herbert (Vaudreuil): […] First, may I outline why I asked for these documents and why I believe that some documents must exist somewhere in the Department of Justice. It is true that when we are dealing with variations in the application of justice in the provinces we do have certain… Read more Canada, House of Commons Debates, “Application of Federal Laws in Various Provincial Courts”, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess (2 April 1981) →
Document Information Date: 1981-04-02 By: Canada (Parliament) Citation: Canada, Senate Debates, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess, 1981 at 2217-2220. Other formats: Click here to view the original document (PDF). SENATE DEBATES — April 2, 1981 [Page 2217] THE CONSTITUTION EFFECT OF JUDGMENT OF SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND Hon. Raymond J. Perrault (Leader of the Opposition): Honourable senators, yesterday a number of questions were asked on the subject of the Constitution, and I undertook to inquire of the appropriate sources in the government and to obtain certain information requested by the Leader… Read more Canada, Senate Debates, “Motion for an Address to Her Majesty the Queen—Effect of Judgment of Supreme Court of Newfoundland”, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess (2 April 1981) →
Document Information Date: 1981-04-02 By: Canada (Parliament) Citation: Canada, House of Commons Debates, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess, 1981 at 8877-8881. Other formats: Click here to view the original document (PDF). COMMONS DEBATES — April 2, 1981 THE CONSTITUTION REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEGAL OPINION [Page 8877] [English] Right Hon. Joe Clark (Leader of the Opposition): Madam Speaker, my question is directed to the Prime Minister and it relates to the so-called Kirby document, the strategy document that was set out by the government in the summer of… Read more Canada, House of Commons Debates, “Request for Publication of Department of Justice Legal Opinion”, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess (2 April 1981) →
Document Information Date: 1981-04-02 By: Canada (Parliament) Citation: Canada, House of Commons Debates, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess, 1981 at 8885-8889. Other formats: Click here to view the original document (PDF). COMMONS DEBATES — April 2, 1981 [Page 8885] POINTS OF ORDER MR. CLARK—THE CONSTITUTION—SUGGESTED PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING PROPOSED RESOLUTION Right Hon. Joe Clark (Leader of the Opposition): Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order concerning House business and flowing from the fraternal discussions between the Leader of the New Democratic Party (Mr. Broadbent) and the Prime Minister (Mr.… Read more Canada, House of Commons Debates, “Mr. Clark—The Constitution—Suggested Procedure for Amending Proposed Resolution”, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess (2 April 1981) →
Document Information Date: 1981-04-02 By: Canada (Parliament) Citation: Canada, House of Commons Debates, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess, 1981 at 8890-8902. Other formats: Click here to view the original document (PDF). COMMONS DEBATES — April 2, 1981 PRIVILEGE MR. KILGOUR—SUGGESTED ILLEGALITY OF THE RESOLUTION ON THE CONSTITUTION [Page 8890] Madam Speaker: I am now ready to rule on the question of privilege raised by the hon. member for Edmonton-Strathcona (Mr. Kilgour). Mr. David Kilgour (Edmonton-Strathcona): Madam Speaker, I will be brief. I apologize to the Chair for not speaking more concisely… Read more Canada, House of Commons Debates, “Mr. Kilgour—Suggested Illegality of the Resolution on the Constitution”, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess (2 April 1981) →
Document Information Date: 1981-04-01 By: Canada (Parliament) Citation: Canada, House of Commons Debates, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess, 1981 at 8850-8856. Other formats: Click here to view the original document (PDF). COMMONS DEBATES — April 1, 1981 [Page 8850] POINT OF ORDER MR. CLARK—THE CONSTITUTION—SUGGESTED PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING PROPOSED RESOLUTION Right Hon. Joe Clark (Leader of the Opposition): Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order having to do with government business which may well facilitate proceedings in the House. It arises from an exchange between the Prime Minister (Mr.… Read more Canada, House of Commons Debates, “Mr. Clark—The Constitution—Suggested Procedure for Amending Proposed Resolution”, 32nd Parl, 1st Sess (1 April 1981) →